nwhiker: (Default)
This morning, they continued their evisceration of the separation of church and state.

Expected later this week: West Virginia vs EPA, which will probably remove all or most authority from regulating agencies. This one will be catastrophic in its impact.

My expectation: listening to regulatory agencies will be left up to the states -states' rights are good unless they're gun control- and that will include the FDA. Except some states to refuse some FDA approved medications to be sold in their states, like, oh, Plan B, misoprostol (stomach ulcers and medication abortion), puberty blockers, any medication used primarily by transfolk etc.

I don't know if they'll go directly, or right away, after contraceptive pills, but some might. I also expect that some devices that are FDA regulated will be banned, like IUDs.

I do very much hope I'm wrong.

As always, thanks Bernie! Thanks Jim! Thanks Susan and Jill! And Vladimir too! I so love living in a dystopian United States.
nwhiker: (Default)
1.I'm avoiding commenting on the SCOTTUS decision, I am still too enraged. Bodily autonomy is pretty fundamental. That said, I found this article telling: The Constitution Is Whatever the Right Wing Says It Is.

2. 25 years ago, _Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone_ was published. My god, it's been a while. I heard about it later that year and spent a lot of time trying to get an indie Seattle bookstore to get it for me. They never did manage to, LOL. I know Rowling's stance on transwomen is problematic (understatement), but I still love the books. Well, 6 of them. Wasn't too fond of the last one. Anyhow.

3. It is So. Fucking. Hot. My kids are at Pride. Despite sunscreen and water, I expect them to come home burnt and dehydrated.
nwhiker: (Default)
I'm horrified, disgusted, enraged, and desperately sad for what this country has become.

It's over.
nwhiker: (Default)
I was going to go to the Bans Off Our Bodies march either Mt Vernon or Bellingham. The local one doesn't work because we need to be in Bellingham this afternoon.

But of course, because of things that Can't Move and the timing of those marches, I won't be able to make either.

Just ugh.

Things were scheduled long before the draft was leaked.

And it's not even raining for once!
nwhiker: (Default)
I didn't have the brains to do it on Sunday, so it's three things for Wednesday this week, LOL.

1. California is truly a beautiful state.

2. It doesn't matter if she is pre-menarche, post-menopausal, had her tubes tied, whatever. ALL women are impacted by this decision. The risk might not be the same for all, but the fact that women's bodies will be controlled by the state affects all of us. Every. Single. One. It's not "oh, it's just for abortion", it's that women are no longer have all the right afforded to men. This is a fucking problem. And yeah, I know people say "oh, slippery slope arguments aren't legit", it is not a slippery slope argument because a woman not having full personhood can, and no doubt will, lead to other consequences: already women are prosecuted for pregnancies gone awry.

3. I just finished reading Empire of Pain: The Secret History of the Sackler Dynasty by Patrick Padden Keefe and it's chilling. I knew the Sacklers were evil, I did not quite realize just how fucking evil. I mean, sociopath level of evil. Highly recommend the book.
nwhiker: (Default)
To the "Bernie or Bust" people, the "the lesser of two evils is still evil" people, the "I have to vote my conscience" people, the "stop being hysterical about the Supreme Cour, Roe v Wade is settled", the "there is no difference between Clinton and Trump"...

... well, you little fuckers, thanks a lot. Women have lost the fundamental right to control our own bodies. We will be hostage to the state, forced to bear children we do not want. We will miss out on college education, lose career opportunities, be stuck in bad relationships, often consigned to poverty, and live lives much less full of joy and accomplishments, at the mercy of a mistake, a moment of folly, bad luck, or a rapist.

Aside from the selfish, privileged scum who just couldn't vote for her, four men share the blame:

Bernie Sanders and his oversize ego. He couldn't admit he lost to a woman so stayed in the race, screaming that it was rigged, and his stupid followers, as inane as Trump's morons, believed him, and believe him to this day.

James Comey. 'Nuff said. Fucker.

Mitch McConnell who stole Obama's SCOTUS pick.

While I want the above three to rot in a hell I don't believe in, the fourth person is as responsible, but on doesn't deserve quite that level of punishment.

Barack Obama. He didn't fight hard enough for Garland, just sorta let it happen. He had the bully pulpit of the presidency, but instead of protesting McConnell's thievery, he mentioned it from time to time, but did not fight tooth and nail for his pick. He also nominated a milquetoast white man, I still think that it would have been harder for McConnell to treat a Black woman, an Asian man, etc the way Garland was treated. A recess appointment would have been another possibility. I don't know, but clearly doing nothing was the wrong choice, and Obama was a weak president who didn't want to make waves, and wanted everyone to just get along. That didn't work too well.

I'm both enraged, horrified, and deeply, profoundly sad.

ETA Note that I did not include the 5 fascist members of the SCOTUS in my list of people to blame. They are perjurers who lied to get on the court, but they were known quantities, chosen because they would overturn Roe, and pretty much for nothing else... Amy Coathanger Barett couldn't even name the protections of the 1st Amendment, something even I can do, and was wildly panned as unqualified from a judicial point of view. However, as a handmaiden in her Christo-fascist church, her actual ability to law and judge was not a factor.
nwhiker: (Default)
[Ooops. Wrote this last night forgot to post.]

WTF Tennessee? I mean, really, W.T.F. ???

WTF Oklahoma? I mean, really, W.T.F. ???


FTR:

Would a Proposed Tennessee Law ‘Legalize Child Marriage’?. The answer from snopes (and other media) is YES. WTF?

No link for OK, just that they criminalized abortion and oh, hey, a woman having an abortion after being raped would be subject to a higher penalty that the rapist, if indeed he is ever caught.

Added 6 Apr: found some articles this morning.

Oklahoma Law Would Make Abortion Providers Felons.
nwhiker: (Default)
In a suburban Fort Worth House runoff, Republicans debate killing women over abortion.

This is both batshit crazy and profoundly dangerous.


But then [North Richland Hills Republican David Lowe] went on to praise a House bill last session that would have made ending a pregnancy a potential capital crime..

In other words, Texas could kill the woman, along with anyone who encouraged her or helped.

Lowe’s final comment was chilling.

“Do we all agree that abortion is murder?” he asked the crowd.

“Absolutely. There should be consequences for it.”


His opponent:


“Abolishing abortion is important, but we can do that without giving women the death penalty,” Klick told the luncheon.

She talked about how pregnancy clinics counsel many teenage girls. At 18, they’d be eligible for the death penalty.

“Do we want to give those young girls the death penalty?” Klick asked.


And she's the more moderate of the two. Doesn't think we really need to kill women who've had abortions.

W.T.F.

The American Taliban is alive, well, and becoming more and more powerful each election.

I keep on telling dh we need to get the fuck out of this country, while we can do so in a controlled manner, with family and finances in order, before we become part of a rash of refugees sometime in the late 2020s.
nwhiker: (Default)
I didn't listen to all of 'em but bits and pieces, plus reporting and I often went back to listen when I saw what I thought had to be misleading headlines.

They were not.

Republicans want to take us back a century.

WTF is the matter with those people? Using the term people loosely here, I think.

I mean, reversing Roe, Griswold, and Loving? And leaving it to the states? Yeah, no. I mean, I know Roe is toast, the stupid little handmaiden will make sure of that, but Griswold? Birth control? I mean, I guess, since it and Roe are both determined based on a certain right to privacy, but damn. I suspect that Eisen... need to look it up.... Eisenstadt vs Baird, the right to birth control for unmarried couples, will go along with. Jesus. Women are truly going to be second class citizens in many states.

1920, here we come.

ETA So I had to look up the spelling for Eisenstadt, and that led me to notice that the right so homosexual relations also falls under the right to privacy. As does Obergefell.
nwhiker: (Default)
Content warning, it's pretty explicit, pro-abortion, and crude at times.

Despite their wails about the baybeeees! the pro-forced birth folks don't care about babies. If they did, they'd be working to implement programs to help women have babies in a healthy manner, be able to take some time off to heal, bond, breastfeed etc, and then find high quality childcare, as well as ensure that the baybees always have enough food, get a good education etc. They don't do any of that.

Nothing is too extreme to protect the baybees! charging women with murder if they terminate a pregnancy, allowed random people to snitch on then, forcing them to give birth, bombing places women get abortions (and other health care), killing doctors who perform said abortions. Anything for the baybeee!

As soon as the baybeeee! is born anything it needs is too extreme. Paid maternal leaves. Subsidized childcare. Decent school... heck, school lunches. There is no love for the born baybeee!, only for the fetus it once was.

Having established that...

It's about controlling women, of course. When a woman can control her reproduction, she essentially loses control of her life trajectory, when a rape can derail everything, an unplanned pregnancy keep her from fulfilling her dreams and living to her full potential. Women are forced to live a life of no mistakes.

Note that I don't see the same thing for men. When a man gets someone pregnant and has to pay child support, the themes are often that 1. he's a good man, to pay child support 2. it was her fault, she should have used birth control/better birth control 3. there is often a sense that one mistake, one tiny episode of penis ejaculating in a vagina, should not result in this poor man having to send SO MUCH MONEY to support the baby. After all, the mother was at least as responsible. IOW, generally, women get condemnation, men get sympathy. (I am no doubt seeing a dynamic that may be reserved to/for white men, btw. I expect black men get some level of condemnation, though not as much as women, and black women get the most condemnation of all, of course.) Anyhow, for a man, it was just one mistake, poor guy, vs well, she should have--

So yeah. Controlling women and ensuring that any mistake or misstep or episode of abuse can have profound life altering consequences.

The argument is that once an embryo is present, it's no longer just her body, the woman's body belongs to the embryo, no matter the age of said embryo, or the desires of the woman carrying it.

With the pushing back of the "ok to have an abortion" timeline, we're getting to the point where as soon as the penis has ejaculated, abortion is no longer allowed.

Part of the message is the fetishization of virginity. The idea is that only a woman who has not had a penis inside of her is worthy of self-determination, to a small degree. Once the almighty penis has penetrated her, it's all over for the woman, she loses any worth she might have had, and her value plummets to less than that of a 256-cell blastocyst.

There has long been a fetishization of virginity, it's clearly nothing new. This is just another facet of it, I think.
nwhiker: (Default)
1. We listened to the email stories for, what? A year and a half at least? The accusations, none of which were remotely true. The three (was it?) email that were on her server and classified (after the fact but they never mention that), a story the media kept pushing and pushing, despite clear evidence that it was a nothing burger, until it cost her the election.

And Trump stole documents that should have gone to the Archives. Some top secret.

The media, not even two weeks after this all came to light, is out arguing that it's "no big deal" and saying it's time to move on.

I just....



2. I want this thing.



I think it's a paean to kitsch, tack, and OMG, WTF? Dh thinks it's just tacky. It's also stupid expensive, for a piece of shit metal bird, to be fair. He said I could, of course, get it, but he didn't want anyone to see it. What the point is of that, I don't know.

3. Russia, Ukraine etc. I'm not going to go into the fact that the GOP seems to be... on Russia's side. WTF? Chamberlain wannabes, the whole bunch of them. Anyhow, that said... What I don't understand is why Western Governments don't use the Power of the Visa. Kick not, not Russian diplomats, but anyone in the US/Western Europe, who is holding a visa, and don't give out any more. Give people who are here on short term visas 3 months to get the fuck out of the US. Do not allow any more baby tourism, which will really hurt. Much of this impact will be felt by the wealthier Russians, the ones who will put pressure on Putin. What am I missing?



3. just yank their visas and kill baby tourism
nwhiker: (Default)
1. At some point, someone will explain to me why US calendars start with Sunday. Drives me bugfuck. It's the weekend and Saturday and Sunday should be next to each other, so you can see how they overlap. It's ridiculous to separate them. Usually, I print out calendar pages from time and date, cut them to size and glue them into my Washington Trails Association calendar. This year, I spent an hour on amazon with the search term "Monday start" calendar to try to find one. I did (I hope!) and it'll be here on Tuesday.

2. There have been swans on the lake for the past few days. I love seeing them. And they're so freaking BIG.

3. Backsliding democracies tend to see a period of backtracking on women's rights and a rise in antisemitism. Check and check.
nwhiker: (Default)
One of the funny things about rowing, at least around here.

Women are referred to as ladies.

Men are referred to as boys.

I've done it myself. Screamed encouragement at Linnea's boat using 'ladies'. I've personally not dared refer to Perry's '8' as 'boys' but Linnea did on Sunday. And certainly, their cox calls them boys.

So yeah. I'm not really sure what to think about that. It's just funny because I so bristle at the term 'ladies', since I've usually seen it used with a tinge of condescension, as in 'young ladies' with the implication that often has.

But somehow it works. Hearing Linnea called out 'Go boys!' as her brother's boat rowed by. Hearing her shouting at the various women's crews she was supporting with a 'Go ladies! You've got this' was just a nice insight as to how terms that might not work in the larger world are encouraging and positive standards in this little community.

Also, for anyone curious. You can't see much except for the area and the stroke sear (Perry is in 7 seat right behind him) but this was their race last Sunday. The sound the boat makes as it flexes is kinda eerie.

nwhiker: (Default)
Joe Fucking Manchin has killed family leave, the media is crowing "Dems in disarray! House and Senate with go R in 2022" in their self-fulfilling prophecy kind of way, and the Bernie bro was renting their clothes and wailing that they'll never vote for anther spineless Dem again, it was better when Mitch McTurtle was in power.

Never mind that 96% of Senate Dems were onboard with family leave and 100% of Republicans against it.

Anyhow here, Jill Filipovic pretty much sums up many of the dynamics of why Machin and the Repugs oppose family leave: Free Female Labor Is The Plan. Nothing profoundly new, but a well written coherent exposé of the consequences of this decision, the obvious ones and the less talked about ones alike.

I stayed at home, something I deeply regret, and I had a wonderful spouse who treated what I did as my job in a good way, which meant that when he was home he shared the kid and house stuff. Yes, I did all the annoying stuff like doctor's appointments and all that, but when he was home, it was all shared. I was incredibly lucky. Still I wish daycare hadn't fallen through, waaaay back when, and that I hadn't been in a horrid job with a crazy boss when I was pregnant with Anne-Chloe. Those two things just made it easier to slide into stay-at-hone.
nwhiker: (Default)
I wasn't able to march today, which makes me sad. I was going to, but I'd have had to go alone and my knee isn't stable enough for me to be willing to go into Seattle for a march (have to take the bus) without any backup if something goes wrong with dh at trains and Perry on the water. So blah. Abortion is health care.

Reading the 4th book of a series. Book 1 was spectacular. Book 2, meh. Book 3 was great. Book 4 is dreadful and a total slog. I don't want to drop it, because the series so far is interesting, but I'm hating this book, it's long, and I'm only 40% done, and it's taking forever to read because, well, boring slog.
nwhiker: (Default)
I think part of what gets me -and only a part- is how this was done.

That taking away my bodily autonomy, women's bodily autonomy, leaving us in a category of citizens who cannot make our own decisions about our own physical habitats, wasn't even worth a courtroom and a full presentation of legal arguments.

That women were stripped of a fundamental right in the middle of the night, but the Shadow Docket, as if it had no importance whatsoever.

I'm still reeling.
nwhiker: (Default)
Waiting to find out if Roe vs Wade is killed in TX tonight.

If I were a woman in TX? I'd think about a preventative abortion every month. Just in case.

God this is sickening.

And thanks, Bernie, you arrogant fuckhead, and your "R vs W is settled law" and "It won't be that bad!" bros.

Ugh.

And it's over. Women in Texas have lost access to legal, safe abortion.

I hope there is a hell for Bernie and the "can't vote for the lesser of two evil, gotta vote my conscience" fucks.

ETA Wednesday morning. LOL. Bernie former press secretary, all around supporter, and proud Bernie-or-Bust 2016 Jill Stein voter is busy deleting tweets this morning, claiming "we've grown too much to be doing 2016 discourse". Yeah, 2016 discourse, bitch, in which you claimed, tweeting [profile] nprpolitics, "you guys are 100% wrong re the importance of the SCOTUS in support of HRC", for example.
nwhiker: (Default)
An incredible speech.

Lake Highlands High Valedictorian Pulls Switcheroo on Commencement Speech.

In Texas. Scrapped her approved commencement speech to talk about the cruel, stupid, and typically Republican 6 week abortion ban that Texass approved.


Recently the heartbeat bill was passed in Texas. Starting in September, there will be a ban on abortions that take place after 6 weeks of pregnancy, regardless of whether the pregnancy was a result of rape or incest. 6 weeks. Most women don’t even realize they’re pregnant by then. And so, before they have the time to decide if they are emotionally, physically, and financially stable enough to carry out a full-term pregnancy, before they have the chance to decide if they can take on the responsibility of bringing another human into the world, the decision has been made for them by a stranger. A decision that will affect the rest of their lives.

I have dreams, hopes, and ambitions. Every girl here does. We have spent our whole lives working towards our futures, and without our consent or input, our control over our futures has been stripped away from us. I am terrified that if my contraceptives fail me, that if I’m raped, then my hopes and efforts and dreams for myself will no longer be relevant. I hope you can feel how gut-wrenching it is, how dehumanizing it is, to have the autonomy over your own body taken from you.


You go, girl! I wish you the best in your future and I'll keep your name in mind, I hope to hear from you again.

Also, credit to the high school: they did not mute the mic.
nwhiker: (Default)
Yeah, I totally agree that Deborah Birx was a complete idiot when she said that Trump followed the science, or when she did not speak out when he suggested ingesting bleach etc.

She acknowledged that that all deaths beyond the first 100k were probably attributable to Trump's terrible response.

Hers, by extension, to some extent.

But.

Here is one thing that is bugging me: yet again a certain large segment of the media seems to be putting the blame on her. Blame the woman. It's just such a tired trope. Why not blame Pence, who is gearing up to run in 2024? Or the surgeon general, Jerome Adams? Why Dr Birx and not that sorry excuse of a doctor and scientist Dr Redfield, head of the fucking CDC, who is not claiming Sars-CoV2 came from a fucking lab in Wuhan, yeah no, delusional? Or Azar, who apparently fought with just about everyone involved at least once? Or or or... maybe let's start seriously talking about how Trump committed a fucking genocide?

But no. Must easier to lay the whole blame for the previous admin's pathetic response on the shoulders of the one women.

May 2025

M T W T F S S
   1 234
5 67891011
12 131415161718
192021 22232425
2627282930 31 

My writing

Fanfic

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Heavily Modified Style Inspired By

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated 20 Jun 2025 04:57
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios