![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
nwhikerI didn't listen to all of 'em but bits and pieces, plus reporting and I often went back to listen when I saw what I thought had to be misleading headlines.
They were not.
Republicans want to take us back a century.
WTF is the matter with those people? Using the term people loosely here, I think.
I mean, reversing Roe, Griswold, and Loving? And leaving it to the states? Yeah, no. I mean, I know Roe is toast, the stupid little handmaiden will make sure of that, but Griswold? Birth control? I mean, I guess, since it and Roe are both determined based on a certain right to privacy, but damn. I suspect that Eisen... need to look it up.... Eisenstadt vs Baird, the right to birth control for unmarried couples, will go along with. Jesus. Women are truly going to be second class citizens in many states.
1920, here we come.
ETA So I had to look up the spelling for Eisenstadt, and that led me to notice that the right so homosexual relations also falls under the right to privacy. As does Obergefell.
They were not.
Republicans want to take us back a century.
WTF is the matter with those people? Using the term people loosely here, I think.
I mean, reversing Roe, Griswold, and Loving? And leaving it to the states? Yeah, no. I mean, I know Roe is toast, the stupid little handmaiden will make sure of that, but Griswold? Birth control? I mean, I guess, since it and Roe are both determined based on a certain right to privacy, but damn. I suspect that Eisen... need to look it up.... Eisenstadt vs Baird, the right to birth control for unmarried couples, will go along with. Jesus. Women are truly going to be second class citizens in many states.
1920, here we come.
ETA So I had to look up the spelling for Eisenstadt, and that led me to notice that the right so homosexual relations also falls under the right to privacy. As does Obergefell.
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png){kind=small}